Introduction

Nuclear reactor power generation requires higher levels of precision, quality and safety than other industrial sectors. In this context, nuclear welding represents a critical discipline, responsible for the structural integrity of components subjected to extreme pressures, temperatures and radiation. From refrigeration piping to pressure vessels, welded joints must stand the test of time and ensure safe operations for decades.

This article focuses on current techniques, emerging innovations and the main challenges of nuclear welding in power plants.

What is nuclear welding?

It is a process of joining metallic materials that, while employing principles and techniques similar to those of conventional welding, such as electric arc welding (GTAW, SMAW, SAW) and automated methods, is distinguished by its application in critical components of nuclear facilities. In this context, exceptional standards of quality, safety and structural integrity are required due to the potential catastrophic consequences of a welded joint failure.

It may interest you

• The 2 key characteristics of Lean Manufacturing: How to implement them successfully in an organization

• Operational risk assessment with artificial intelligence and machine learning

Unlike other industrial environments, nuclear welding is strictly regulated by codes such as ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Section III, which establishes specific requirements for the design, fabrication, and inspection of nuclear components. In addition, highly rigorous non-destructive testing (NDT) is required, as well as full traceability of materials, procedures and qualified welders involved in each joint. These factors make nuclear welding a highly specialized process, where technical excellence and regulatory compliance are fundamental.

What is the role of the nuclear welder?

The nuclear welder is a highly qualified professional to perform metallic joints through welding processes in environments where nuclear components exist or will exist. Their work is essential for the assembly, installation, modification, and maintenance of infrastructures in nuclear power plants, shipyards with nuclear propulsion vessels, and facilities associated with atomic energy.

This professional must master manual welding techniques and automated processes, interpret three-dimensional drawings, meet stringent quality, traceability, radiation safety, confidentiality and structural safety requirements. They must often work in confined spaces or demanding positions, including underwater. In addition to high manual dexterity, this professional requires a solid technical background, knowledge of welding materials and metallurgy, and specific certifications that validate their competence in nuclear environments.

Nuclear welding procedure qualification

The Welding Procedure Qualification (WPS) of nuclear welds and their corresponding qualification records (PQR), like conventional welds, are governed by ASME Section IX. The variant that the application on nuclear components is deeply influenced by the additional requirements set forth in ASME Section III, by nuclear quality assurance systems, and under strict quality, traceability and safety controls. The main rationale behind these procedures is presented below:

ASME Section IX provides the technical criteria for the qualification of WPS and PQR, based on essential variables (type of process, type of material, position, thickness, type of joint, etc.) and mechanical tests.
ASME Section III defines specific requirements for the manufacture, inspection, and traceability of Class 1, 2 and 3 components intended for nuclear systems, establishing more rigorous controls on the elaboration, validation, and use of WPS and PQR.
In nuclear facilities, the WPS must be validated by qualified nuclear quality systems personnel and approved in accordance with the plant’s QA/QC program.
A high level of specificity and documentary control is required, with versions formally approved, changes managed under controlled review procedures and storage according to traceability requirements.
The PQR documents the results obtained when applying a WPS under controlled conditions, validating technical feasibility through destructive testing (tensile, flexure, hardness, impact, macro-attack, etc.). However, in the nuclear sector, additional or more stringent testing may be required, especially if the materials will be subjected to radiation, high pressure, or corrosive environments.
The PQR must be signed by an authorized inspector and endorsed by the entity responsible for the nuclear quality system.
Validation by the person responsible for the nuclear quality system.
Application of stricter acceptance criteria in non-destructive testing (NDT), according to the standards defined in ASME V or supplementary codes.
The difference is not in how the WPS is done according to ASME IX, but in the additional requirements imposed by the nuclear environment for its use.
ASME IX remains the same; what changes is the level of validation, traceability, and control imposed by ASME III and the nuclear quality program.

Quality control, standards, and certifications in nuclear welds

In nuclear facilities, the quality of welds is strictly controlled, since any failure can compromise the structural and radiological safety of the systems. For this reason, rigorous quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) processes are applied, backed by international standards, certified personnel and advanced inspection techniques.

Applicable standards and codes: Nuclear welds must comply with international standards that regulate from design to final inspection such as ASME BPVC, ASME Section III, ASME Section V, ASME Section IX, ASME NQA-1, ISO 3834, and ISO 9712 / ASNT:

Non Destructive Testing (NDT): These tests allow evaluating the integrity of welds without altering their functionality using Ultrasonic (UT), Industrial Radiography (RT), Penetrating Liquids (PT), Magnetic Particles (MT) methods.

Destructive Testing (DT): These tests are performed to evaluate the mechanical and metallurgical properties of welds with tensile, flexural, impact (Charpy) and macro-attack tests.

QA/QC personnel certifications and qualifications: The personnel in charge of inspection and quality control must have internationally recognized certifications such as Certified Welding Inspector, Certification Scheme for Welding Inspection Personnel and ISO 9712 / ASNT SNT-TC-1A levels I, II and III.

Nuclear welding QA/QC inspector functions: The nuclear welding QA/QC inspector plays an essential role in nuclear welding quality assurance, verifying the quality and safety of the welding process. He reviews procedures (WPS/PQR), validates welders’ qualifications and monitors execution conditions. Performs visual inspections and non-destructive testing to detect defects, and ensures full traceability of materials and procedures, verifies and validates that work is executed according to design specifications. In addition, he manages non-conformities, participates in nuclear quality system audits, verifies compliance with radiation safety standards and promotes quality and safety culture among operating personnel.

Traceability and documentation: Traceability is critical in nuclear weld quality control. Each welded joint must be supported by a detailed record that allows reconstructing the entire history of the process. This documentation includes information on the base and filler materials used, with their respective batches, quality certificates and technical specifications. The welding procedures applied (WPS) are also recorded, together with the operating parameters used during execution. In addition, the personnel involved are identified, both welders and inspectors responsible for the work. Finally, the results of visual inspections and non-destructive (NDT) or destructive (DI) tests are integrated, which allow validating the integrity of the weld according to nuclear standards.

Traditional vs. advanced nuclear welding techniques

Traditional techniques

During the first decades of nuclear power plant operation, nuclear welding techniques were based on manual methods and procedures established based on practical experience and strict compliance with standards such as ASME Section III, RCC-M or ANSI/AWS D1.1.

Manual welding (SMAW, GTAW): Dominance of craft techniques, high dependence on operator skill.
Mechanical joint preparation: Meticulous edge adjustment by hand tools.
Printed documentation: Quality control and procedures in physical format.
Visual inspection and traditional industrial radiography.

Limitations:

Risk of inter-operator variability.
Limited reproducibility.
Longer execution time and need for manual corrections.

Advanced techniques in nuclear welding

While traditional techniques are still in use, technological evolution has allowed the adoption of more automated, accurate and reproducible methods. These techniques are revolutionizing the way welds on critical nuclear components are designed, executed and inspected.

Automated Orbital Welding (Orbital GTAW): It is widely used in primary and secondary circuits of reactors. It allows welding in pipelines and closed systems without direct manual intervention. It ensures high quality and reduces human defects.
Local Electron Beam Welding (LEBW) and Laser Beam Welding (LBW): Applications in reactor internals, fuel cladding, pressurized structures. Extreme precision in environments under localized vacuum or special atmospheres with high performance. Suitable for deep joints with minimum thermal distortion, without filler material and much less time than traditional welding.
Integration with SCADA systems for traceability and documentation.

Current and future challenges

Aging infrastructure: Many nuclear power plants were built between the 1970s and 1990s. Today they face the challenge of aging components. Welding must be applied in operating environments with high radioactivity, which limits human intervention. Hence the increasing implementation of robotic systems.
Shortage of qualified personnel: The undertaking to gradually resume services to nuclear facilities, mainly in France, is demanding qualified nuclear welders in excess of supply. This has motivated intensive training programs and agreements with technical institutions in France and in states such as Texas, where several nuclear power plants operate in Texas, initiatives have been created to train new talents with specialization in orbital welding and procedures regulated by the ASME BPVC.
Integration with digital technologies: The future of nuclear welding includes the incorporation of digital twins, artificial intelligence and augmented reality for process simulations, pre-validation and training. These tools aim to reduce human error and improve operational efficiency.
Updating regulations: Regulations must adapt to new technologies such as 3D printing and remote welding.
Specialized training: Training of welders with knowledge in programming, mechatronics and numerical control.
Validation of procedures: Each automated technique must be qualified under demanding protocols that ensure structural integrity.

Conclusions

Nuclear welding is a highly specialized discipline where science, engineering, technical standards and human skill come together. The rigorous demands of safety and durability in nuclear reactors require the integration of traditional and advanced techniques, all subject to strict quality standards.

Automation through orbital welding, the use of robots in nuclear power plants, rigorous validation through tests required for nuclear welds and the demand for extreme quality control have raised the technological level of this field. Standards such as the ASME BPVC and technical documents such as the WPS ensure accurate traceability, while challenges related to welder training and aging infrastructures open up new opportunities for innovation.

In a context of growing energy demand and concerns about emissions, nuclear power plants in Texas and around the world will continue to require highly trained welders and technological solutions that ensure safe and efficient operations.